“As is happening elsewhere, so-called national parishes, at one time established to serve the needs of a particular national or ethnic community, are being discontinued ..."
OK, first off, I object to "discontinued." It is a corporate, not a canonical term. Is the corporate mentality so entrenched in the Archdiocese that its spokesman spouts it like national parishes are a product line that is not putting enough value into the bottom line?
Second, I think identifying a class of parishes and blanket extinguishing them all for the same reason violates canon law. To the only surviving national parishes in the Archdiocese I can only say, "YO! Heads up! Maybe you're next."
Many national parishes are being "discontinued" a hundred years or more after they were established. They have a potent and unique charism grown from the foundation laid down by the founding parishioners and enriched by those who were later drawn to worship there. In the intervening years they retain their cultural characteristics but evolve to include diverse parishioners who are attracted to community values, the residual customs and the living examples of faith given by the old timers. When it closed 100 after years, St. Stanislaus Kostka's Mass was in English. Some Polish hymns were played on special occasions and potluck dinners had servings of kielbasi and pierogi which were enjoyed by all. All were welcomed into the community and people of all ethnicity were drawn to the simplicity and warmth of the parish. At one time we had 2 young choristers of African American/Filipino heritage singing heartily in phonetic Polish.
"...and the members of those parishes are being integrated into the local parishes,” said spokesperson Joseph Zwilling.
OK, now I object to the term "integrated." I have experienced 2 parish closings and in neither case was I included in a planned "integration." My churches were abruptly locked. That was it.
When a parish is extinguished, the material assets are supposed to follow the former parishioners to the parish into which the extinct parish was merged. Mr. Zwilling's statement is grammatically ambiguous. I hope the sheep aren't being dispersed to multiple folds while the monies go...where?
“...There are a number of reasons for this, the two most important being the desire to create vibrant, thriving communities of faith, and, with a declining number of priests, to utilize our clergy as effectively as possible to meet the needs of the people,” the statement continued."
I would like Mr. Zwilling to explain how closing churches and extinguishing parishes against the wishes of parishioners, beginning with Cardinal Egan's "Realignment" in 2005, has created vibrant and thriving communities of faith. If the communities of faith were so vibrant and thriving, would we be suffering an increasing paucity of vocations to the priesthood?
The "declining number of priests" is a compelling problem, but is it a valid reason for targeting national parishes and closing them? No.
In my personal experience the reasons for closing parishes advanced by the Archdiocese can be plausible, may even be true. But are they causal? We can have our suspicions but we can't know because so far, the Archdiocese has remained opaque, offering the public sporadic and advantageous tokens of transparency. To learn more about the situation at the former St. John Baptist de la Salle R.C. Church, read Uncertainty looms over Staten Island church as Archdiocese declines to renew lease.